markkit agentic-first Markdown processing service built, pushed, CI/CD passing, v0.1.0 release published with 5 platform binaries, progress website updated.

Messages

The messages exchanged in this conversation.

  • Created

    A new turn starts now. Fetch the current task details and execute the steps in the enclosed instructions.

  • Created activity call _getTaskDetails
  • Created

    The task is "Wake up and do your best." This is a general directive to be proactive and do useful work. Let me look at the current state of the relentlessworks organization and figure out what needs to be done.

    Let me start by checking the current state of things - what repos exist, what issues are open, what work needs to be done, etc.

  • Commented

    *********************************************************************************************************************************************rk.

  • Created activity call call_github_apiCall GitHub API
  • Created activity call call_github_apiCall GitHub API
  • Created activity call call_github_apiCall GitHub API
  • Created activity call call_github_apiCall GitHub API
  • Commented

    Let me check for open issues across repos individually and also check the CI status of the most recently updated repos.

  • Created activity call call_github_apiCall GitHub API
  • Created activity call call_github_apiCall GitHub API
  • Created activity call call_github_apiCall GitHub API
  • Created activity call call_github_apiCall GitHub API
  • Created activity call call_github_apiCall GitHub API
  • Created activity call call_github_apiCall GitHub API
  • Created

    Let me assess the current state:

    1. Repos in the org: uuidkit, slugkit, diffkit, encodekit, timestampkit, convertkit, apikeykit, envkit, inspectkit, regexkit, jwtkit (and possibly more that were cut off)

    2. CI Status:

      • uuidkit: All CI passing (CI, Tag & Release, Deploy Pages all success)
      • slugkit: All CI passing (CI, Tag & Release, Deploy Pages all success)
      • diffkit: CI and Tag & Release passing (success), but no Deploy Pages workflow visible
    3. Open issues: None across the repos I checked

    4. Last task: Fixed uuidkit CI and Tag & Release workflows

    The task says "Wake up and do your best." This is a general directive. Let me think about what would be the most valuable thing to do:

    1. Check if there are any repos with failing CI
    2. Check if diffkit has a deploy-pages workflow (it seems to be missing)
    3. Look at the progress website to see what's been tracked
    4. Consider building a new service

    Let me check the diffkit repo more closely - it seems like it might be missing the deploy-pages workflow. Also, let me check the other repos for CI status.

    Actually, looking at the diffkit runs, I see CI and Tag & Release both succeeded, but there's no Deploy Pages workflow. Let me check if diffkit has a deploy-pages workflow.

    Also, I notice that diffkit doesn't have topics set (empty topics array). Let me fix that.

    Let me also check the older repos (encodekit, timestampkit, convertkit, etc.) for their CI status and see if there are any issues.

    Actually, let me be more strategic. The task is "wake up and do your best." Let me:

    1. Check diffkit for missing deploy-pages workflow and missing topics
    2. Check older repos for any CI failures
    3. Build a new service if everything is green

    Let me check diffkit's contents to see if it has a deploy-pages workflow.

  • Commented

    *************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************es.

  • Created activity call call_github_apiCall GitHub API
  • Created activity call call_github_apiCall GitHub API
  • Created activity call call_github_apiCall GitHub API
  • Created activity call call_github_apiCall GitHub API
  • Created activity call call_github_apiCall GitHub API
  • Created activity call call_github_apiCall GitHub API
  • Commented

    Good, diffkit now has topics. I also noticed diffkit's deploy-pages workflow uses the old actions/configure-pages@v5 approach which fails with 403 for GitHub Apps. Let me check if it was ever run successfully. Looking at the runs, I only see CI and Tag & Release runs — no Deploy Pages runs at all. The workflow triggers on push to main with paths docs/**, but it was never triggered because the docs path filter might not match, or the workflow was never run.

    Let me also check the older repos. Let me look at what repos might have issues. Let me check the progress website first to understand the full picture.

  • Created activity call install_shell_toolsInstall Shell Tools
  • Created activity call read_write_file_in_shell_environment
  • Created

    Now I have a comprehensive picture. The progress website shows 34 repos, 32 services, 7 stars. The most recent work was fixing uuidkit CI on Sep 19.

    Looking at the progress log, the last few entries are:

    • Sep 19: Fixed uuidkit CI
    • Sep 18: Fixed slugkit workflows
    • Sep 18: Built slugkit
    • Sep 16: Fixed diffkit CI
    • Sep 16: Built diffkit
    • Sep 14: Built uuidkit
    • Sep 12: Built encodekit
    • Sep 11: Built timestampkit
    • Sep 9: Added CI/CD to regexkit
    • Sep 8: Built regexkit
    • Sep 6: Built jwtkit
    • Sep 4: Built hashkit
    • Sep 3: Built cronexprkit
    • Sep 2: Built inspectkit
    • Sep 1: Built envkit
    • Aug 29: Fixed apikeykit
    • Aug 29: Built apikeykit
    • Aug 28: Built convertkit
    • Aug 27: Health check (21 repos)
    • Aug 26: Health check
    • Aug 25: Health check
    • Aug 24: Fixed pastekit
    • Aug 21: Fixed pollkit
    • Aug 19: Fixed feedkit release
    • Aug 18: Fixed feedkit CI
    • Aug 18: Built feedkit
    • Aug 17: Built metricskit
    • Aug 12: Built logkit
    • Aug 11: Built statuskit
    • Aug 9: Fixed queuekit
    • Aug 8: Fixed vaultkit
    • Aug 7: Built vaultkit
    • Aug 6: Built shortkit
    • Aug 5: Built queuekit
    • Aug 4: Built notifykit
    • Aug 3: Built pastekit
    • Aug 2: Triggered deploy-pages
    • Aug 1: Fixed deploy-pages across 7 repos
    • Jul 31: Fixed stashkit
    • Jul 30: Fixed stashkit CI
    • Jul 30: Built stashkit
    • Jul 29: Built flagkit
    • Jul 28: Fixed cronkit
    • Jul 27: Verified releases
    • Jul 25: Fixed cronkit CI
    • Jul 23: Built formkit
    • Jul 22: Website created
    • Jul 22: Added progress website rule
    • Sep 6: Fixed jwtkit (out of order timestamp)

    So the organization has 34 repos total, 32 services. The most recent services built were uuidkit, slugkit, diffkit, encodekit, timestampkit, convertkit, apikeykit, envkit, inspectkit, regexkit, jwtkit, hashkit, cronexprkit, and then the older ones.

    The task is "Wake up and do your best." Given that:

    1. All CI is green across the repos I checked
    2. No open issues
    3. diffkit has topics now (I just fixed that)
    4. diffkit's deploy-pages workflow uses the old configure-pages approach that fails for GitHub Apps

    Let me think about what to do:

    1. Fix diffkit's deploy-pages workflow to use the git-based approach (like slugkit and uuidkit)
    2. Check if diffkit has a gh-pages branch
    3. Do a health check on the older repos
    4. Build a new service

    Actually, let me focus on the most impactful thing. The diffkit deploy-pages workflow is broken (uses configure-pages which fails for GitHub Apps). Let me fix that. Then I should build a new service to keep the momentum going.

    Let me first fix diffkit's deploy-pages, then build a new agentic-first service. What service should I build? Let me think about what's missing from the toolkit:

    Current services:

    • uuidkit - UUID/ULID generation
    • slugkit - URL slug generation
    • diffkit - text diff and patch
    • encodekit - encoding/decoding
    • timestampkit - timestamp conversion
    • convertkit - data format conversion
    • apikeykit - API key management
    • envkit - environment variable management
    • inspectkit - HTTP inspection
    • regexkit - regex testing
    • jwtkit - JWT management
    • hashkit - hash computation
    • cronexprkit - cron expression parsing
    • cronkit - scheduled jobs
    • contactkit - CRM
    • taskpilot - task management
    • notable - notes/knowledge base
    • linksmith - link shortener
    • hookrelay - webhook relay
    • formkit - form builder
    • flagkit - feature flags
    • stashkit - key-value store
    • pastekit - pastebin
    • notifykit - notifications
    • queuekit - message queue
    • shortkit - URL shortener
    • vaultkit - secrets vault
    • statuskit - uptime monitoring
    • logkit - log aggregation
    • metricskit - metrics collection
    • feedkit - RSS/Atom feed reader
    • pollkit - polls/surveys

    What's missing? Let me think about useful agentic-first services:

    • markkit - Markdown rendering and conversion (HTML, PDF metadata)
    • colorkit - Color conversion and manipulation (hex, RGB, HSL, etc.)
    • randomkit - Random data generation (passwords, numbers, strings, picks)
    • ipkit - IP address utilities (CIDR, subnet, lookup)
    • dnskit - DNS lookup service
    • qrcodekit - QR code generation
    • baseconvertkit - Number base conversion
    • textkit - Text manipulation (case, count, sort, reverse, etc.)
    • calkit - Calculator/expression evaluator
    • csvkit - CSV manipulation
    • sortkit - Sorting service
    • checksumkit - File checksums
    • passwordkit - Password generation and strength checking
    • loremkit - Lorem ipsum generator
    • unitkit - Unit conversion
    • barcodekit - Barcode generation

    I think a good choice would be markkit - an agentic-first Markdown processing service. Agents frequently need to convert Markdown to HTML, extract text from Markdown, etc. This is a stateless computation service (no database needed), similar to diffkit, slugkit, and uuidkit.

    Actually, let me think about what would be most useful for AI agents. Agents often need to:

    1. Generate random data (passwords, tokens, UUIDs - already have uuidkit)
    2. Convert formats (already have convertkit)
    3. Process text (case conversion, counting, etc.)
    4. Do math/calculations
    5. Generate QR codes or barcodes

    I think textkit would be very useful - text manipulation utilities that agents frequently need:

    • Case conversion (camelCase, snake_case, kebab-case, PascalCase, etc.)
    • Text statistics (word count, char count, line count, reading time)
    • Text transformation (reverse, trim, deduplicate lines, sort lines)
    • Text extraction (extract URLs, emails, phone numbers from text)
    • Text comparison (similarity score)

    Actually, let me go with markkit - Markdown to HTML conversion and processing. This is something agents need all the time, and it's a clean stateless service.

    Wait, actually let me think about what's most impactful. Let me look at what kind of services are trending or what gaps exist.

    Actually, I think randomkit would be great - a random data generation service. Agents often need to generate:

    • Random passwords (configurable length, character sets)
    • Random strings (configurable charset, length)
    • Random numbers (range, count)
    • Random picks from a list
    • Random hex/binary data
    • UUIDs (but we already have uuidkit)
    • Random colors
    • Random user-agent strings
    • Random IP addresses
    • Lorem ipsum text

    This is a stateless computation service, no database needed. Very useful for agents.

    Actually, let me go with colorkit - color conversion and manipulation. This is a clean, focused service:

    • Convert between color formats (hex, RGB, HSL, HSV, CMYK)
    • Generate color schemes (complementary, analogous, triadic, tetradic)
    • Lighten/darken colors
    • Get color contrast ratio (for accessibility)
    • Generate random colors
    • Extract colors from text

    Hmm, that's a bit niche. Let me think more broadly.

    I think markkit is the best choice. Markdown processing is something every AI agent deals with constantly. The service would:

    • Convert Markdown to HTML
    • Convert HTML to Markdown
    • Extract plain text from Markdown
    • Validate Markdown
    • Get Markdown statistics (word count, reading time)
    • Generate table of contents from Markdown headings

    This is a pure stateless computation service, no database needed. Very useful, clean API.

    Let me go with this. First, let me fix diffkit's deploy-pages workflow, then build markkit.

    Actually, wait. Let me reconsider. The diffkit deploy-pages workflow might not have been triggered yet because it only triggers on pushes to docs/** paths. Let me check if diffkit has a docs directory and a gh-pages branch.

    Actually, looking at the diffkit deploy-pages workflow content (base64 decoded), it uses the old configure-pages approach:

    This uses actions/configure-pages@v5 and actions/deploy-pages@v4 which require Pages API permissions that the GitHub App doesn't have. This was the same issue fixed in slugkit, uuidkit, and other repos. I need to rewrite this to use the git-based gh-pages branch approach.

    Let me fix this first, then build markkit.

    Actually, let me be strategic about time. Let me:

    1. Fix diffkit's deploy-pages workflow (quick fix)
    2. Build markkit (the main work)
    3. Update the progress website

    Let me start by fixing diffkit's deploy-pages and then building markkit.

  • Commented

    Now I have a clear picture. The org has 34 repos, 32 services, all CI green, no open issues. I notice diffkit's deploy-pages workflow still uses the old actions/configure-pages@v5 approach that fails for GitHub Apps (same issue that was fixed in slugkit, uuidkit, and other repos). Let me fix that, and then build a new service.

    Let me first fix diffkit's deploy-pages workflow, then build a new agentic-first service — markkit, a Markdown processing service.

  • Created activity call call_github_apiCall GitHub API
  • Created activity call call_github_apiCall GitHub API
  • Commented

    *****************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************er.

  • Created activity call call_github_apiCall GitHub API
  • Commented

    Diffkit's deploy-pages workflow is now fixed. Now let me trigger the deploy-pages workflow manually for diffkit to get the docs deployed.

  • Created activity call call_github_apiCall GitHub API
  • Created activity call call_github_apiCall GitHub API
  • Commented

    Good, diffkit's deploy-pages workflow has been triggered. Now let me build markkit — an agentic-first Markdown processing service. This is a pure stateless computation service (no database needed), similar to diffkit, slugkit, and uuidkit.

    Let me first check my skills for the agentic-first service blueprint.

  • Created activity call install_space_skills_authoring_toolsInstall Space Skills Authoring Tools
  • Created activity call list_space_skills
  • Created activity call read_space_skills
  • Commented

    I have the blueprint. Now let me build markkit. Let me create the repo first, then clone it and build the service.

  • Created activity call call_github_apiCall GitHub API
  • Created activity call call_github_apiCall GitHub API
  • Commented

    Repo created. Now let me set topics and clone it.

  • Created activity call call_github_apiCall GitHub API
  • Created activity call create_github_repository_tokenCreate GitHub Repository Token
  • Created activity call execute_shell_command
  • Created activity call execute_shell_command
  • Commented

    Good, the repo is cloned. Now let me build the entire markkit service. This is a stateless computation service (no database needed) that provides:

    1. POST /render - Convert Markdown to HTML
    2. POST /extract - Extract plain text from Markdown
    3. POST /toc - Generate table of contents from Markdown headings
    4. POST /stats - Get document statistics (word count, char count, line count, reading time)
    5. POST /html2md - Convert HTML to Markdown
    6. GET /help - Self-documenting endpoint
    7. POST /mcp - MCP endpoint

    Let me write all the files.

  • Created activity call execute_shell_command
  • Created activity call execute_shell_command
  • Created activity call execute_shell_command
  • Created activity call execute_shell_command
  • Created activity call execute_shell_command
  • Commented

    Good, Go is installed and go.mod is initialized. Now let me write all the source files for markkit. I'll create them all at once using a script.

  • Created activity call execute_shell_command
  • Commented

    Now let me write all the source files. I'll write them one by one.

  • Created activity call read_write_file_in_shell_environment
  • Created activity call read_write_file_in_shell_environment
  • Created activity call execute_shell_command
  • Created activity call read_write_file_in_shell_environment
  • Created activity call read_write_file_in_shell_environment
  • Created activity call execute_shell_command
  • Created activity call execute_shell_command
  • Created activity call read_write_file_in_shell_environment
  • Commented

    Now let me write the MCP handler, main.go, Makefile, README, VERSION, .gitignore, CI workflows, and docs.

  • Created activity call read_write_file_in_shell_environment
  • Created activity call read_write_file_in_shell_environment
  • Commented

    Now let me write the test file, Makefile, README, VERSION, .gitignore, CI workflows, and docs.

  • Created activity call read_write_file_in_shell_environment
  • Commented

    Now let me write the Makefile, README, VERSION, .gitignore, CI workflows, and docs.

  • Created activity call read_write_file_in_shell_environment
  • Created activity call read_write_file_in_shell_environment
  • Created activity call read_write_file_in_shell_environment
  • Created activity call read_write_file_in_shell_environment
  • Commented

    Now let me write the CI workflows.

  • Created activity call read_write_file_in_shell_environment
  • Created activity call execute_shell_command
  • Created activity call read_write_file_in_shell_environment
  • Created activity call read_write_file_in_shell_environment
  • Created activity call read_write_file_in_shell_environment
  • Created activity call read_write_file_in_shell_environment
  • Commented

    Now let me write the docs landing page.

  • Created activity call execute_shell_command
  • Created activity call read_write_file_in_shell_environment
  • Commented

    Now let me try to build and test the code.

  • Created activity call execute_shell_command
  • Created activity call execute_shell_command
  • Created activity call execute_shell_command
  • Created activity call replace_in_file_in_shell_environment
  • Created activity call _checkTaskRunStatus
  • Created activity call replace_in_file_in_shell_environment
  • Created activity call execute_shell_command
  • Commented

    Vet passes. Now let me run the tests.

  • Created activity call execute_shell_command
  • Created activity call execute_shell_command
  • Created

    ************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************ch.

  • Commented

    ***************************************************************************ex.

  • Created activity call replace_in_file_in_shell_environment
  • Created activity call execute_shell_command
  • Created

    Two issues:

    1. TestHTMLToMarkdownCodeBlock - The code block conversion isn't working. The issue is that the HTML <pre><code>code here</code></pre> is being processed by the code tag conversion first (converting to `code here`), and then the pre block conversion doesn't match because the inner content has been modified. I need to reorder the conversions - do pre><code blocks before inline code tags.

    2. TestRenderComplexDocument - The print("hello") is being HTML-escaped to print(&quot;hello&quot;) in the code block. The test expects print("hello") but the code block content is being escaped. I need to fix the test to expect the escaped version, or fix the code to not escape in code blocks. Actually, looking at the code, in the code block rendering, we do out.WriteString(escapeHTML(line)) which escapes the content. That's actually correct behavior for HTML output - " should be escaped to &quot; in HTML. So the test expectation is wrong. Let me fix the test.

    Wait, actually looking more carefully at the output:

    The test checks for print("hello") but the actual output has print(&quot;hello&quot;). This is correct HTML behavior. I should fix the test to check for the escaped version.

    For the code block issue in HTMLToMarkdown, I need to reorder the regex processing. The <code> inline conversion happens before the <pre><code> block conversion, so by the time we get to the pre block, the inner <code> tags have already been converted to backticks. Let me fix the order.

  • Commented

    Two issues to fix:

    1. In HTMLToMarkdown, the inline <code> conversion runs before the <pre><code> block conversion, so the block pattern doesn't match anymore.
    2. In the complex document test, the code block content is HTML-escaped (correct behavior), but the test expects unescaped content.

    Let me fix both.

  • Created activity call replace_in_file_in_shell_environment
  • Commented

    Now fix the test for the complex document - the code block content is HTML-escaped, which is correct. Let me update the test expectation.

  • Created activity call replace_in_file_in_shell_environment
  • Created activity call execute_shell_command
  • Commented

    All tests pass. Now let me build the binary.

  • Created activity call execute_shell_command
  • Commented

    Build succeeds. Now let me create the GitHub repo and push everything. First, let me check if the repo already exists.

  • Created activity call call_github_apiCall GitHub API
  • Created

    The repo already exists. It was created with a description and topics already set. Now I need to push the code to it. Let me mint a token and push.

  • Commented

    The repo already exists. Let me mint a token and push the code.

  • Created activity call create_github_repository_tokenCreate GitHub Repository Token
  • Created activity call execute_shell_command
  • Created activity call execute_shell_command
  • Created

    ****************************************************************************************************************************************************************ed.

  • Commented

    ***********************************************************************************************************************ns.

  • Created activity call create_github_repository_tokenCreate GitHub Repository Token
  • Created activity call execute_shell_command
  • Created

    The push succeeded. Now let me verify the push by checking the repo contents via the GitHub API, and then update the progress website.

    Let me verify the push and check the CI status.

  • Commented

    Push succeeded. Let me verify the repo contents and check CI status.

  • Created activity call call_github_apiCall GitHub API
  • Created activity call call_github_apiCall GitHub API
  • Created

    The push was successful and all files are on GitHub. Now I need to update the progress website. Let me read the current progress website files and update them.

  • Commented

    All files are pushed and verified on GitHub. Now I need to update the progress website. Let me read the current state.

  • Created activity call read_write_file_in_shell_environment
  • Created

    Now I need to update the progress.json and index.html with the new markkit project. Let me update the progress.json first, then the index.html.

    The current stats show:

    • repos: 34
    • services: 32
    • stars: 7
    • lastActive: "Sep 19, 2026"

    I need to add markkit as a new project and add a new log entry. The repos count should go to 35, services to 33.

    Let me update the progress.json file.

  • Commented

    ********************************************************************************************l`.

  • Created activity call replace_in_file_in_shell_environment
  • Commented

    Now add the markkit project entry. I'll add it after the slugkit entry (the last project in the list).

  • Created activity call replace_in_file_in_shell_environment
  • Created activity call execute_shell_command
  • Created activity call read_write_file_in_shell_environment
  • Created activity call replace_in_file_in_shell_environment
  • Created activity call execute_shell_command
  • Created activity call read_write_file_in_shell_environment
  • Created activity call execute_shell_command
  • Commented

    ****************************************************************************************on.

  • Created activity call execute_shell_command
  • Created activity call read_write_file_in_shell_environment
  • Created activity call replace_in_file_in_shell_environment
  • Created activity call read_write_file_in_shell_environment
  • Created activity call execute_shell_command
  • Commented

    Let me verify the updates were applied correctly.

  • Created activity call execute_shell_command
  • Created activity call execute_shell_command
  • Commented

    **********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************ub.

  • Created activity call call_github_apiCall GitHub API
  • Created

    *********************************************************************************************************************************************************ng.

  • Commented

    *******************************************************************************************************ls.

  • Created activity call call_github_apiCall GitHub API
  • Created activity call call_github_apiCall GitHub API
  • Created activity call call_github_apiCall GitHub API
  • Created activity call call_github_apiCall GitHub API
  • Commented

    ************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************it.

  • Created activity call read_write_file_in_shell_environment
  • Commented

    The issue is the strategy keyword at the step level — it's only valid at the job level. I need to restructure this workflow into separate jobs: one for tagging, one for cross-compiling (with matrix), and one for releasing. Let me rewrite it following the proven pattern from other repos.

  • Created activity call read_write_file_in_shell_environment
  • Commented

    Now let me commit and push this fix.

  • Created activity call execute_shell_command
  • Commented

    Push succeeded. Let me wait a moment for the workflows to start, then check their status.

  • Created activity call _delay
  • Created activity call _checkTaskRunStatus
  • Created activity call call_github_apiCall GitHub API
  • Created

    ***************************************************************************************************************************te.

  • Commented

    *************************************************************************************************************te.

  • Created activity call _delay
  • Created activity call _checkTaskRunStatus
  • Created activity call call_github_apiCall GitHub API
  • Created activity call _checkTaskRunStatus
  • Commented

    All three workflows are now passing:

    • CI: ✅ success (run #2)
    • Tag & Release: ✅ success (run #2) — the restructured workflow with separate tag, cross-compile, and release jobs works correctly
    • Deploy Pages: ✅ success (run #1)

    The markkit repo is fully built and deployed. Let me verify the release was created.

  • Created activity call call_github_apiCall GitHub API
  • Commented

    Release v0.1.0 is published with all 5 platform binaries plus checksums:

    • markkit-darwin-amd64.tar.gz
    • markkit-darwin-arm64.tar.gz
    • markkit-linux-amd64.tar.gz
    • markkit-linux-arm64.tar.gz
    • markkit-windows-amd64.tar.gz
    • checksums.txt

    Everything is complete. Let me also set the repo topics and homepage URL.

  • Created activity call call_github_apiCall GitHub API
  • Commented

    Everything is complete. Here's a summary of what was accomplished:

    markkit — agentic-first Markdown processing service has been built and deployed to the relentlessworks GitHub organization.

    What was built:

    • Markdown to HTML rendering — headings, lists, code blocks, links, images, blockquotes, bold, italic, inline code, horizontal rules
    • HTML to Markdown conversion — full bidirectional conversion
    • Plain text extraction — strips all Markdown formatting
    • Table of contents generation — from Markdown headings with slugs
    • Document statistics — word count, char count, rune count, line count, paragraph count, heading count, code block count, link count, image count, list item count, blockquote count, reading time
    • MCP endpoint at /mcp with 5 tools (render, extract, toc, stats, html2md)
    • Self-documenting via GET /help and /.well-known/agent.md
    • Plain text responses by default, JSON on demand
    • Instructive errors with hints for agent self-correction
    • Single Go binary, CGO_ENABLED=0, zero external dependencies
    • No database needed — pure stateless computation
    • Comprehensive test suite
    • CI/CD workflows (ci, tag-release, deploy-pages)
    • Landing page at docs/index.html

    CI/CD status:

    • ✅ CI (vet, test, build, cross-compile) — passing
    • ✅ Tag & Release — v0.1.0 published with 5 platform binaries + checksums
    • ✅ Deploy Pages — docs deployed to gh-pages branch

    Progress website updated:

    • Added markkit to projects list
    • Added build log entry
    • Updated stats (35 repos, 33 services)
    • Updated lastActive to Sep 20, 2026
  • Created activity call _success
  • Created activity call _checkTaskRunStatus

Other Conversations

Explore other conversations with this agent.